BACKGROUND: Although small airway dysfunction is a common respiratory dysfunction, its prognosis after lung cancer surgery is often neglected. This study investigated the relationship between small airway dysfunction and outcomes in patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery was conducted between December 2019 and March 2021 at Ningbo First Hospital. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the possible associations between postoperative outcomes and clinical variables, including small airway dysfunction. To balance the potential confounding factors, propensity score matching was performed to establish 1:1 small airway dysfunction and small airway normal function group matching. RESULTS: In this study, 1,012 patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer were enrolled. Small airway dysfunction was present in 18.7% of patients (189/1,012). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the small airway dysfunction group was higher than that of the small airway normal function group (16.4% vs 6.2%, P < .001). The most significant postoperative pulmonary complications were pneumonia (7.4% vs 2.4%, P < .001) in the small airway dysfunction and normal function groups, respectively. In addition, a significantly prolonged median hospital length of stay was observed in the small airway dysfunction group compared to the small airway normal function group (median [interquartile range], 9 [7-12] vs 8 [7-9], P < .001). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 298 patients (149 pairs) were included in the comparison between small airway dysfunction and small airway normal function, and this association remained. Postoperative pulmonary complications (13.4% vs 6.0%, P = .032) were still higher, and length of stay (median [interquartile range] 9 [7-11] vs 8 [6-10] days, P = .001) was still longer in the small airway dysfunction group. Multivariate analysis indicated that small airway dysfunction was the independent risk factor associated with both postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 2.694, 95% confidence interval: 1.640-4.426, P < .001) and prolonged length of stay (beta = 1.045, standard error = 0.159, 95% confidence interval: 0.733-1.357, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that small airway dysfunction increased the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and prolonged length of stay in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective and sustainable form of weight loss. Bariatric surgery before elective operations for colorectal pathology may improve postoperative outcomes. To compare patients with and without prior bariatric surgery undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer in terms of postoperative morbidity and health care use. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer from 2015 to 2019 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were stratified according to their history of bariatric surgery. Propensity score matching with 4:1 nearest-neighbor matching was performed according to demographic, operative, and hospital characteristics. The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included system-specific postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, postoperative length of stay, total admission health care cost, and post-discharge disposition. McNemar's test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test were performed. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1,197 patients without prior bariatric surgery and 376 patients with prior bariatric surgery were included. Patients with prior bariatric surgery had an absolute reduction of 6.5% in overall in-hospital postoperative morbidity (19.1% vs 25.6%, P < .0001), a $5,256 decrease in hospitalization cost ($70,344 vs $75,600, P = .034), and were more likely to be discharged home after their index operation (72.9% vs 63.9%, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery before surgery for colorectal cancer may be associated with decreased postoperative morbidity and health care use. Bariatric surgery and other forms of rapid and effective weight loss, such as very low-energy diets, should be evaluated further for the optimization of obese patients before nonbariatric abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Excessive opioid prescribing has resulted in opioid diversion and misuse. In July 2018, Michigan's Public Act 251 established a state-wide policy limiting opioid prescriptions for acute pain to a 7-day supply. Traumatic injury increases the risk for new persistent opioid use, yet the impact of prescribing policy in trauma patients remains unknown. To determine the relationship between policy enactment and prescribing in trauma patients, we compared oral morphine equivalents prescribed at discharge before and after implementation of Public Act 251. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, adult patients who received any oral opioids at discharge from a Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2021, were identified. The exposure was patients admitted starting July 1, 2018. Inpatient oral morphine equivalents per day 48 hours before discharge and discharge prescription oral morphine equivalents per day were calculated. Student's t test and an interrupted time series analysis were performed to compare mean oral morphine equivalents per day pre- and post-policy. Multivariable risk adjustment accounted for patient/injury factors and inpatient oral morphine equivalent use. RESULTS: A total of 3,748 patients were included in the study (pre-policy n = 1,685; post-policy n = 2,063). Implementation of the prescribing policy was associated with a significant decrease in mean discharge oral morphine equivalents per day (34.8 ± 49.5 vs 16.7 ± 32.3, P < .001). After risk adjustment, post-policy discharge prescriptions differed by -19.2 oral morphine equivalents per day (95% CI -21.7 to -16.8, P < .001). The proportion of patients obtaining a refill prescription 30 days post-discharge did not increase after implementation (0.38 ± 0.48 vs 0.37 ± 0.48, P = .7). CONCLUSION: Discharge prescription amounts for opioids in trauma patients decreased by approximately one-half after the implementation of opioid prescribing policies, and there was no compensatory increase in subsequent refill prescriptions. Future work is needed to evaluate the effect of these policies on the adequacy of pain management and functional recovery after injury.

In recent years, many surgical prediction models have been developed and published to augment surgeon decision-making, predict postoperative patient trajectories, and more. Collectively underlying all of these models is a wide variety of data sources and algorithms. Each data set and algorithm has its unique strengths, weaknesses, and type of prediction task for which it is best suited. The purpose of this piece is to highlight important characteristics of common data sources and algorithms used in surgical prediction model development so that future researchers interested in developing models of their own may be able to critically evaluate them and select the optimal ones for their study.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of liver transplantation with hepatic arterial reconstruction using interposition saphenous vein conduits are not widely reported. Here, we share our experience using great saphenous vein conduits for hepatic arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (n = 950). The saphenous vein conduits were used in 39 patients. We compared hepatic artery thrombosis, graft dysfunction, and 30-day and 1-year survival in the early (2012-2017) and late (2017-2020) transplant periods. RESULTS: Among 39 patients (of whom 30 [76.9%] were males, median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease was 24 [interquartile range, 17-27], median age was 50 [interquartile range, 43-54]), saphenous vein conduits were placed on supra celiac aorta in 7 (17.9%), infrarenal aorta in 25 (64.1%), and other arteries in 7 (17.9%) patients. The number of biliary and hepatic vein anastomoses, total arterial ischemia time, portal vein-hepatic artery reperfusion time, and duration of surgery was different in the 2 groups (P < .05). The 30-day mortality was 5/21 (23.8%) and 0 in the early and late periods (P = .05). The 30-day survival was >90% in patients with portal vein-hepatic artery reperfusion time <240 minutes, ≤2 grade 3 complications, no graft dysfunction, and later period of transplantation (P < .05). The 1-year survival with standard transplantation, transplantation with saphenous vein conduits in the early and late period was 87%, 62%, and 89% (P = .022). CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation with saphenous vein conduits is associated with acceptable outcomes. Major complications and arterial ischemia times are major determinants of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing approaches to managing rectal neuroendocrine tumors are underpowered by institutional series. The efficacy of expectant management relative to local excision and radical resection is poorly defined. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients presenting with non-metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumors between 2004 and 2019. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with expectant management. Cox modeling was used to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing expectant management were 1:1:1 propensity score matched for demographics and comorbid disease to those undergoing radical resection and local excision. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival profiles for matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 6,316 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 5,211 (83%) underwent local excision, 600 (9.5%) radical resection, and 505 (8%) expectant management. On multivariable regression, factors associated with expectant management included Black race, government insurance, and tumor size <2.0 centimeters. On Cox modeling, factors associated with mortality included age >65 years, male sex, government insurance, comorbidity score >0, tumor size >2 centimeters, and poorly differentiated histology. On comparison of matched cohorts: patients undergoing radical resection had longer hospitalizations and higher readmission rates than those undergoing local excision; there was no difference in overall survival between cohorts in patients with stage 1 disease; in stage 2 and 3 diseases, patients undergoing local excision and radical resection demonstrated improved rates of overall survival relative to those undergoing expectant management. CONCLUSION: Expectant management is a reasonable approach for patients with stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Local excision should be the preferred treatment option for those presenting with stage 2/3 disease.

BACKGROUND: Crohn-related rectovaginal fistulas are notoriously difficult to treat. Studies of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of perianal Crohn fistulizing disease have largely excluded rectovaginal fistulas. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells for refractory rectovaginal fistulizing Crohn disease. METHODS: A phase IB/IIA randomized control trial was performed in a 3:1, single-blinded study. Patients included were adult women with an anovaginal/rectovaginal fistula in the setting of Crohn disease. Seventy-five million mesenchymal stem cells were administered with a 22G needle after curettage and primary closure of the fistula tract at day 0 and month 3. Adverse and serious adverse events were recorded at post-procedure day 1, week 2, week 6, month 3, month 6, and month 12, along with clinical healing, magnetic resonance imaging, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were enrolled and treated-15 treatment and 4 control. There were no adverse or serious adverse events related to mesenchymal stem cell therapy. At 6 months, 50% of the treatment group and 0% of the control had complete clinical and radiographic healing; 91.7% of the treatment group had improvement at 6 months with only one patient having a lack of response, whereas only 50% of the control group had improvement at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells offer a safe alternative treatment approach for rectovaginal fistulas in the setting of Crohn disease. Complete healing was achieved in half of the patients.