Beta-site amyloid-β precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) is a transmembrane aspartic protease and has shown potential as a possible therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease. This aggravating disease involves the aberrant production of β amyloid plaques by BACE1 which catalyzes the rate-limiting step by cleaving the amyloid precursor protein (APP), generating the neurotoxic amyloid β protein that aggregates to form plaques leading to neurodegeneration. Therefore, it is indispensable to inhibit BACE1, thus modulating the APP processing. In this study, we present a workflow that utilizes a multi-stage virtual screening protocol for identifying potential BACE1 inhibitors by employing multiple artificial neural network-based models. Collectively, all the hyperparameter tuned models were assigned a task to virtually screen Maybridge library, thus yielding a consensus of 41 hits. The majority of these hits exhibited optimal pharmacokinetic properties confirmed by high central nervous system multiparameter optimization (CNS-MPO) scores. Further shortlisting of 8 compounds by molecular docking into the active site of BACE1 and their subsequent in-vitro evaluation identified 4 compounds as potent BACE1 inhibitors with IC50 values falling in the range 0.028-0.052 μM and can be further optimized with medicinal chemistry efforts to improve their activity.

Maximum common substructures (MCS) have received a lot of attention in the chemoinformatics community. They are typically used as a similarity measure between molecules, showing high predictive performance when used in classification tasks, while being easily explainable substructures. In the present work, we applied the Pairwise Maximum Common Subgraph Feature Generation (PMCSFG) algorithm to automatically detect toxicophores (structural alerts) and to compute fingerprints based on MCS. We present a comparison between our MCS-based fingerprints and 12 well-known chemical fingerprints when used as features in machine learning models. We provide an experimental evaluation and discuss the usefulness of the different methods on mutagenicity data. The features generated by the MCS method have a state-of-the-art performance when predicting mutagenicity, while they are more interpretable than the traditional chemical fingerprints.