Due to economic, cultural, environmental, and social factors, the prevalence of maxillofacial bone disorders varies in different parts of the world. The present meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of different type of stem cells-based scaffolds and their construction methods in maxillofacial bone disorders. We searched major indexing databases, including PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central without any language, study region, or type restrictions. A systematic search of articles published up to July 2021 was done. Of the 428 studies found through initial searches, 36 met the inclusion criteria. After applying the exclusion criteria, the main properties of 32 articles on 643 animals and 4 experimental studies on 52 patients (age range from 43 to 74 years) included in this meta-analysis. Our pooled analysis showed that stem cells-based scaffolds significantly improved the bone regeneration and formation in maxillofacial bone disorders (Prevalence: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.64, P < 00001, I2 = 90 2). According to the results of these studies, in most studies, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have been used to regenerate bone, and these cells are still the gold standard in bone tissue engineering, a growth factor that is one of the three sides of the tissue engineering triangle. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) especially BMP2 and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are the most widely used growth factor and scaffold respectively. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is used as a scaffold and since it contains proteins, it also used as a growth factor and can be a stimulant of ossification. It seems that the future perspective of bone tissue engineering is to use the prototyping rapid method to build a composite and patient-specific scaffold from CT and MRI images, along with genetically modified stem cells.

Research has shown that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could be a promising therapy for treating progressive heart disease. However, translation into clinics efficiently and successfully has proven to be much more complicated. Many questions remain for optimizing treatment. Application method influences destiny of MSCs and afterwards impacts results of procedure, yet there is no general agreement about most suitable method of MSC delivery in the clinical setting. Herein, we explain principle of most-frequent MSCs delivery techniques in cardiology. This chapter summarizes crucial translational obstacles of clinical employment of MSCs for cardiac repair when analysed trough a prism of latest research centred on different techniques of MSCs application.

Stem cells are very promising for the treatment of a plethora of human diseases. Numerous clinical studies have been conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of various stem cell types. Factors that ensure successful therapeutic outcomes in patients are cell-based parameters such as source, viability, and number, as well as frequency and timing of intervention and disease stage. Stem cell administration routes should be appropriately chosen as these can affect homing and engraftment of the cells and hence reduce therapeutic effects, or compromise safety, resulting in serious adverse events. In this chapter, we will describe the use of stem cells in organ repair and regeneration, in particular, the liver and the available routes of cell delivery in the clinic for end-stage liver diseases. Factors affecting homing and engraftment of stem cells for each administration route will be discussed.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, both stromal vascular fraction (SVF) from adipose tissue and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from adipose tissues were extensively used in both preclinical and clinical treatment for various diseases. Some studies reported differences in treatment efficacy between SVFs and MSCs in animals as well as in humans. Therefore, this study is aimed to evaluate the immune modulation and angiogenic potential of SVFs and MSCs from the same SVF samples to support an explanation when SVFs or MSCs should be used. METHODS: The adipose tissue samples from ten female donors with consent forms were collected. SVFs from these samples were isolated according to the published protocols. The existence of mesenchymal cells that positive with CD44, CD73, CD90, and CD105 and endothelial progenitor cells that positive with CD31 and CD34 was determined using flow cytometry. Three samples of SVFs with similar percentages of mesenchymal cell portion and endothelial progenitor cell portion were used to isolate MSCs. Obtained MSCs were confirmed as MSCs using the ISCT minimal criteria. To compare the immune modulation of SVF and MSCs, the mixed lymphocyte assay was used. The lymphocyte proliferation, as well as IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha concentrations, were determined. To compare the angiogenic potential, the angiogenesis in quail embryo assay was used. The angiogenesis efficacy was measured based on the vessel areas formed in the embryos after 7 days. RESULTS: The results showed that all SVF samples contained the portions of mesenchymal cells and endothelial progenitor cells. MSCs from SVFs meet all minimal criteria of MSCs that suggested by ISCT. MSCs from SVFs efficiently suppressed the immune cell proliferation compared to the SVFs, especially at ratios of 1:4 (1 MSCs: 4 immune cells). MSCs also inhibited the IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha production more efficiently than SVFs (p < 0.05). However, in quail embryo models, SVFs triggered the angiogenesis and neovessel formation better than MSCs with more significant vessel areas after 7 days (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that SVFs and MSCs have different potentials for immune modulation and angiogenesis. SVFs help the angiogenesis better than MSCs, while MSCs displayed the more significant immune modulation. These results can guide the usage of SVFs or MSCs in disease treatment.

The critical feature in trachea replacement is to provide a hollow cylindrical framework that is laterally stable and longitudinally flexible, facilitating cartilage and epithelial tissue formation. Despite advanced techniques and sources of materials used, most inherent challenges are related to the complexity of its anatomy. Limited blood supply leads to insufficient regenerative capacity for cartilage and epithelium. Natural and synthetic scaffolds, different types of cells, and growth factors are part of tissue engineering approaches with varying outcomes. Pre-vascularization remains one of the crucial factors to expedite the regenerative process in tracheal reconstruction. This review discusses the challenges and strategies used in tracheal tissue engineering, focusing on scaffold implantation in clinical and preclinical studies conducted in recent decades.